← Search

Charllayne Wallis

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
128 matches · 70W–58L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.53
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
34%
down to 3.5
66%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 20% down · 80% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.57. Higher than today’s 3.53 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
108 of 129
NV · 4.0
164 of 203

Charllayne is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Charllayne has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Charllayne has gone from the 30th to the 56th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
55.6%
69W–55L · 53.9% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 38.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Kornegay
−0.018below expectation — took 48% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Hayley Hollander / Mary Stephenson
2026-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Kornegay
+0.046better than expected — took 63% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Maria Gonzales / Susan Norris
2026-03-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Kornegay
+0.012better than expected — took 60% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Russell
−0.053below expectation — took 42% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Amy Graybeal / Rachel Calderon Young
2026-02-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marisela Cruz
−0.052below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-02 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Russell
+0.023better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-12-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Kornegay
+0.018better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-11-17 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kari Benson
+0.010about as expected — took 35% of games against 35% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Karen Miller / Betty Hale
2025-11-03 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shauna De La Mare
−0.060below expectation — took 37% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-10-27 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Soderberg
+0.002about as expected — took 44% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-09-29 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kari Benson
+0.016better than expected — took 67% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Amy Waters / Jan Willis
2025-04-28 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shauna De La Mare
+0.017better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.