← Search

Huong Nardelli

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
365 matches · 228W–137L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.43
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
82%
down to 3.5
18%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 57% down · 43% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.49. Higher than today’s 3.43 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
123 of 129
NV · 4.0
189 of 203

Huong is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Huong has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Huong has gone from the 58th to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level11 levels played
3.0
92.9%
26W–2L · 74.4% of games
3.5
70.8%
46W–19L · 59.1% of games
4.0
60.3%
79W–52L · 53.7% of games
4.5
14.3%
3W–18L · 34.2% of games
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 68.4% of games
6.5mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 61.5% of games
7.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.5% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 47.9% of games
8.5mixed
25%
2W–6L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history365 matches
W
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Zommick
−0.032below expectation — took 52% of games against 64% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
Barbara Fair / Denise Mandelbaum
2026-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Zommick
+0.006about as expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-04-27 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Stoddard
−0.014better than expected — took 100% of games against 88% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teddy Stantcheva
−0.003better than expected — took 80% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-28 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.009about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Ruby Marine / Aime Claire Lager
2026-02-16 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Lamb
+0.012about as expected — took 29% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Jordan Bosnos / Tricia Miller
2026-02-09 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shanna Toft
+0.026better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Amy Levasseur / Allison Richards
2026-02-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claudia Sleet
+0.014better than expected — took 47% of games against 41% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-26 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shanna Toft
+0.032better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Sophy Feng / Valerie Murphy
2025-12-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Pham
−0.054below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Rachel Calderon Young / Hayley Hollander
2025-11-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Pham
+0.001about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Karina McAffee / Erika Moore
2025-11-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Pham
+0.020better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.