Search

Irena Khin

Henderson, NV
4.0A year-end 2025
275 matches · 119W–156L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.38
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
93%
down to 3.5
7%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 72% down · 28% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.45. Higher than today’s 3.38 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 4.0
47 of 49
NV · 4.0
197 of 203

Irena is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Irena has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Irena has gone from the 29th to the 34th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
53.5%
77W–67L · 53.4% of games
4.0
32.5%
38W–79L · 45% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 60.9% of games
8.0
0%
0W–5L · 36.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history275 matches
L
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aly Wagonseller
+0.015about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine McNaught
+0.032better than expected — took 48% of games against 36% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
Jennifer Unick / Rebecca Little
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruth-Ann Edwards
0.054below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather George
+0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
Lori LaBarbera / Betty Hale
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruth-Ann Edwards
0.006about as expected — took 71% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruth-Ann Edwards
+0.023better than expected — took 59% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Aime Claire Lager / Pilar Grimes
2026-03-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cherry Lutfi
0.018below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-02 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy King
+0.005about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Allison Richards / Kathryn Garlan
2026-02-23 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy King
+0.021better than expected — took 63% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruth-Ann Edwards
+0.038better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy King
0.054below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Caroline Guenther / Andrea Conway
2026-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nora Taylor
+0.048better than expected — took 71% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.