← Search

Michelle Meert

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 175W–38L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Michelle Meert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history213 matches
W
2026-09-11 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Joseph Apostol mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-07 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Hansen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-08-31 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brian Vanderpool mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Hansen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · DTC · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Shawn McNulty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Adarsh Pandey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-09 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Baker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · DTC · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Shawn McNulty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Joseph Apostol mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Hansen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Adarsh Pandey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Hansen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 61% of games
3.0
95.7%
22W–1L · 74.9% of games
3.5
67.4%
29W–14L · 59.4% of games
4.0
93.8%
15W–1L · 69.1% of games
6.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 64.2% of games
6.5mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 62.3% of games
7.0mixed
84%
21W–4L · 61.8% of games
7.5mixed
72%
18W–7L · 57% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 55.1% of games
8.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
55 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
9 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
8 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova