Search

Amanda Gumberg

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
171 matches · 114W–57L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.45
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
74%
stay 3.5
26%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.38. Lower than today’s 3.45 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
32 of 139
NV · 3.5
39 of 228

Amanda is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amanda has played at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.02.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Amanda has gone from the 68th to the 90th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
62.5%
15W–9L · 61% of games
3.0
70.9%
56W–23L · 60.3% of games
3.5
65.6%
40W–21L · 57.9% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history171 matches
W
2026-07-27 · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracey Lee
0.051below expectation — took 47% of games against 68% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Desiree Kathmann / Heather George
2026-07-13 · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Song
+0.034about as expected — took 25% of games against 21% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Amy Levasseur / Danielle Dyer
2026-07-06 · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Mimi Liu
0.016below expectation — took 37% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Alex Schrack / Patricia Delgado
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Song
0.014about as expected — took 57% of games against 61% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Julie Hughes / Ashley Steffen
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanna Toft
0.031below expectation — took 62% of games against 69% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Song
0.017below expectation — took 42% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Deborah Protell / Karen Watts
2026-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arika Carrier
+0.035better than expected — took 92% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Chelsea Gray / Nichole Averett
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Lind
+0.006better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Jensen
+0.036better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Sally Ryba / Michelle Elliott
2026-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Lind
+0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Nancy Holland / Shiangyuh Wu
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Howser
0.001about as expected — took 59% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanna Toft
+0.026better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.