Search

Jamaica Tan

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
194 matches · 87W–107L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.60
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
10%
down to 3.5
90%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.62. Higher than today’s 3.60 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
90 of 129
NV · 4.0
134 of 203

Jamaica is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jamaica has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jamaica has gone from the 14th to the 34th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
44%
51W–65L · 48% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 46.8% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 47.5% of games
8.0mixed
51.9%
14W–13L · 48.7% of games
8.5mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history194 matches
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Little
+0.009better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Levasseur
0.025below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Little
+0.034better than expected — took 59% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Lori LaBarbera / Jamie Kelvington
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Oraee
0.051below expectation — took 48% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Kayla Blum / Anahi Sanchez
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Francie Doak
0.026below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Levasseur
+0.026better than expected — took 46% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
Jacqueline Roberts / Rozanne Meservey
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Francie Doak
+0.038better than expected — took 63% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Francie Doak
+0.006about as expected — took 28% of games against 32% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Tracey Lee / Yan Uyeno
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Levasseur
+0.005better than expected — took 68% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Levasseur
+0.031better than expected — took 45% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
Kathy Kelbel / Nora Taylor
2025-11-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margret Winter
+0.039better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-11-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Francie Doak
0.017below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.