← Search

Julieanna Edge

Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
242 matches · 158W–84L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.67
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 4.0
18 of 49
NV · 4.0
109 of 203

Julieanna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julieanna has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Julieanna has gone from the 86th to the 40th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
70.5%
110W–46L · 58.9% of games
4.5
53.5%
23W–20L · 51.3% of games
5.0
100%
4W–0L · 76.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history242 matches
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Christine Blake
+0.038better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Nicole Sorrentino / K C Scherrer
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Blake
−0.002about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine DeLisle
−0.014about as expected — took 59% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
K C Scherrer / Teddy Stantcheva
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maricel Renigen
−0.039below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Debora Dean / Jessica Bergerchamps
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · with Jenny Grob
−0.012about as expected — took 47% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Yokoyama
−0.015below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Kristine Jurczyk / Martha Davischamps
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · with Jenny Grob
+0.008better than expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Mary McNulty / Betsy Pettet
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Grob
+0.011about as expected — took 45% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Jessica Ng / Susan Norris
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Pishko
+0.032better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Blake
−0.056below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Barbara Fair / Ruth-Ann Edwards
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Serena Roberts
+0.003about as expected — took 60% of games against 57% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Rebecca Little / Jill Russell
2025-12-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Graybeal
−0.015about as expected — took 71% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.