← Search

Jack Braman

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 96W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jack Braman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history193 matches
W
2026-05-15 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nigel White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-13 · NV/Terry/55&Over6.0M · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Keith Qualls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-01 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert E Kinsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-17 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Waite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-15 · NV/Terry/55&Over6.0M · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rick Holden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-27 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert E Kinsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-25 · NV/Terry/65&OverM6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Fernando Prieto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-20 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Garvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-18 · NV/Terry/65&OverM6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rick Holden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6
L
2026-02-27 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Garvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-20 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-23 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
57.3%
47W–35L · 53.6% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 53.8% of games
7.0
43.9%
29W–37L · 48.4% of games
8.0
20%
2W–8L · 36.1% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
39 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer