← Search

Scot Martin

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
311 matches · 158W–153L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Scot Martin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history311 matches
L
2026-09-13 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Prexy Tamayo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
Maria Dellett / Gabriel Quizon
2026-08-16 · DTC #3 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with NANCIE WEBSTER mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-02 · DTC #3 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Prexy Tamayo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Hom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-30 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Paull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-17 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Sager mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-15 · NV/Martin/55&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Villani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-03 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristyl Addison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-25 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Albert Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · NV/Martin/55&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Villani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Sager mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Albert Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
60.6%
20W–13L · 54.2% of games
3.5
36.4%
36W–63L · 45.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 53.6% of games
7.0
83%
39W–8L · 59.8% of games
5.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 67.4% of games
6.0mixed
46%
23W–27L · 48.6% of games
6.5mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 41.9% of games
7.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.5% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 23.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
94 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
87 matches
#1 Male Doubles
4%
11 matches
#2 Male Doubles
3%
10 matches
#1 Singles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert