← Search

Jack Stansbery

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 73W–79L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jack Stansbery to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
L
2026-05-30 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-16 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with AJ Poulin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-10 · DTC #5 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Krzyzaniak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Mattson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · DTC #5 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Krzyzaniak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-18 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Mattson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-28 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-22 · DTC #5 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christi Lin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Gobel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-15 · DTC #5 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Krzyzaniak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-03-14 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Mattson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
68.3%
43W–20L · 58.2% of games
3.5
31.4%
16W–35L · 43.2% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 49.4% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.7% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 50% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–11L · 30.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 23% of the time
#2 Doubles
23%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
35 matches
#1 Singles
17%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
20 matches
#2 Singles
9%
14 matches
#1 Male Doubles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova