Search

Chris Marlin

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
79 matches · 28W–51L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.08
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 32 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
15%
stay 3.0
85%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 60% stay · 40% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.98. Lower than today’s 3.08 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
7 of 29
NV · 3.0
41 of 193

Chris is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chris has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Chris has gone from the 27th to the 42nd percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
38.7%
12W–19L · 46% of games
3.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 44.3% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 36.6% of games
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 49.7% of games
6.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 53.6% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 22.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history79 matches
L
Jeremy James / Enhua Chen
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Schlatter
0.033below expectation — took 8% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Justin Chang / Jordan Raub
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Craig Weaver
0.006about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Christopher Silversmith / Elijah Dunham
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wael Eid
0.012below expectation — took 14% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Adan Rodriguez
2026-05-16 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.094below expectation — took 35% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Gilmore
+0.046better than expected — took 100% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Rachel Corpuz / Darren Rouvimixed
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robi Hinton
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Jared Overholtzer / Brent Silva
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ralph Beck
0.007below expectation — took 41% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margaret Bruno
+0.000below expectation — took 40% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-05-02 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.020better than expected — took 100% of games against 75% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Matthew Murillo / Alexandria Changmixed
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robi Hinton
+0.000about as expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Matthew Giedt-Paredes / Jasper Kim
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Austin
+0.011about as expected — took 52% of games against 48% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Schlatter
+0.059better than expected — took 75% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.