← Search

Scott Hopson

LAS VEGAS, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
118 matches · 63W–55L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.09
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
12%
stay 3.0
88%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 56% stay · 44% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.99. Lower than today’s 3.09 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
NV · 3.0
35 of 166

Scott is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Scott has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Scott has gone from the 24th to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
66%
31W–16L · 58.5% of games
3.5
35.5%
11W–20L · 45.4% of games
7.0mixed
54.2%
13W–11L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history118 matches
L
James Hill / Brook Lee
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geoffrey Thompson
+0.043better than expected — took 53% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
James Miranda / Chantel Vuchamps
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · with Hayley Hollander
+0.007better than expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · with Hayley Hollander
−0.038below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hayley Hollander
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 70% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Tom Tanksley / Enoch Li
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geoffrey Thompson
+0.002about as expected — took 53% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Christi Lin / John Shookmixed
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hayley Hollander
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hayley Hollander
+0.000below expectation — took 55% of games against 62% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Matthew Giedt-Paredes / Jasper Kim
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gene Lonardo
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
James Miranda / Joe Leavitt
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geoffrey Thompson
+0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Karen Hom / Erik Burnmixed
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hayley Hollander
+0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Robert Carlson / James Hill
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with COLE BOREN
+0.001about as expected — took 40% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hayley Hollander
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.