Search

Tom Tanksley

Las Vegas, NV
3.0A year-end 2025
104 matches · 44W–60L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
20%
stay 3.0
80%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 65% stay · 35% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.97. Lower than today’s 3.07 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
33 of 134
NV · 3.0
42 of 166

Tom is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tom has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Tom has gone from the 70th to the 4th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
54%
27W–23L · 50% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 42% of games
7.0
35.3%
12W–22L · 47% of games
8.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 39.5% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 36.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history104 matches
L
Christopher Silversmith / Elijah Dunham
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandon Trinh
0.001below expectation — took 14% of games against 27% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Geoffrey Thompson / Scott Hopson
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Enoch Li
0.002about as expected — took 47% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Bradley Foreman / Jasper Kim
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Van
0.022below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Allen Song / Ivan Farris
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ran Torrenueva
0.047below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Mauricio Vejar / James Hill
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harrison Fried
0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Wade Richardson / Colin Haas
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Justin Hseih
+0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Jeralyn Marchesi / Ryan Marchesimixed
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Bernstein
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Bernstein
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
George Baggott / Shaza Nayefmixed
2026-01-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barb Stanley
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Joseph Engle / Kristin Stowemixed
2026-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Bernstein
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
James Mcclary / Ken Kesick
2025-12-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Pursel
+0.041better than expected — took 40% of games against 29% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Brian Brancato / Matthew Murillo
2025-12-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Van
0.010below expectation — took 45% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.