Teams

SPANISH OAKS #2

2025 NTA FALL SENIOR LEAGUE · 7.0 MEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-12vs DTC #3Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJoseph Engle / Robert Kinas vs Sean Ono / Josiah Garlan4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Pursel / Tom Tanksley vs James Mcclary / Ken Kesick4-6, 4-6
2025-12-05vs DTC #1Split 11
L#1 DoublesJoseph Engle / Daniel Pursel vs Charles Jones / Wade Richardson3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTom Tanksley / William Feast vs Craig Slayter / Don Guluzzy6-2, 6-1
2025-11-23vs SPANISH OAKS #1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTom Tanksley / Daniel Pursel vs Darin McKinney / Kevin O'Hara3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJoseph Engle / Robert Kinas vs Scot Martin / Shaine Stevenson3-6, 5-7
2025-11-20vs DTC #2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Feast / Tom Tanksley vs Timothy Havasi / Michael Miller0-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Pursel / Joseph Engle vs Samuel Gordon / Alvin Sabas1-6, 6-7
2025-10-31vs DTC #3Split 11
L#1 DoublesTom Tanksley / Joseph Engle vs STEPHANE BIRY / James Mcclary4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Pursel / Robert Kinas vs Thomas Schinabeck / Michael Dali3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-24vs DTC #1Won 10
W#1 DoublesPASHA RAFAT / Joseph Engle vs Reynaldo Braganza / Stacey Howard6-1, 6-1
2025-10-17vs DTC #2Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDaniel Pursel / Tom Tanksley vs Samuel Gordon / Alvin Sabas2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-10vs SPANISH OAKS #1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Kinas / Daniel Pursel vs Brent Muir / Absalom Alcaraz4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Engle / Tom Tanksley vs Steven McCrary / Darin McKinney0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Joseph Engle
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.99
Daniel Pursel
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.99
William Feast
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Tom Tanksley
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.75
Jose Despujos Cardillo
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
PASHA RAFAT
published
Robert Kinas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Tanksley + William Feast2349% gamesnot enough data
Tom Tanksley + Daniel Pursel0540% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Joseph Engle
18W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Daniel Pursel
87W–84L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3.5
William Feast
58W–182L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Tom Tanksley
44W–60L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Jose Despujos Cardillo
43W–82L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
PASHA RAFAT
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Kinas
22W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.