Search

Getnet Fikre

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
99 matches · 55W–44L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.15
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
3%
stay 3.0
97%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 36% stay · 64% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.03. Lower than today’s 3.15 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
19 of 141
NV · 3.0
23 of 173

Getnet is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Getnet has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Getnet has gone from the 62nd to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
68.3%
28W–13L · 56.7% of games
3.5
44.4%
24W–30L · 47.6% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 66.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history99 matches
W
Chris Rasmussen / Darrell Luzzo
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roger Guzman
+0.041better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Greg Johnson / Kelly Williams
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victor Cardoza
+0.017better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Daniel Pursel / Brent Silva
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roman Baker
0.007below expectation — took 35% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Waite
+0.016better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Aaron Merkin-morokoff / Adan Rodriguez
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Vanderpool
+0.004better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Howard Rosenblatt / Bernard Osullivan
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Waite
0.031below expectation — took 48% of games against 59% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
George Baggott / Terry Hulse
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Waite
0.004about as expected — took 59% of games against 59% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Zhao Lang / Jerry Prodoehl
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Vanderpool
+0.003better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Nicholas Hansen / Abraham Ibarra
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert E Kinsey
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Drew Saldana / Ryan Marchesi
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zachary Austin
0.060below expectation — took 29% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Scott Hopson / Mitchell Pohlman
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jared Overholtzer
+0.028better than expected — took 43% of games against 35% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Gil Ophir / Jayson Burak
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Johnny Underwood
0.024about as expected — took 67% of games against 70% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.