← Search

Nancy McPartlin

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
201 matches · 111W–90L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy McPartlin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history201 matches
L
Jaqueline Schultz / Anjelica Moore
2026-05-30 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Berman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-09 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Berman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-28 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin McPartlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-18 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Berman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-11 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin McPartlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-14 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Berman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-08 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin McPartlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-07 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Luanne Balelo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-01 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin McPartlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-08 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin McPartlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
76.7%
33W–10L · 59.6% of games
3.5
42.9%
33W–44L · 48.3% of games
7.0mixed
70%
21W–9L · 59.8% of games
7.5mixed
54.8%
17W–14L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 44.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
43 matches
#1 Singles
17%
35 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer