← Search

Josh Haldeman

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
149 matches · 86W–63L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.56
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
22%
stay 3.5
78%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 68% stay · 32% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.46. Lower than today’s 3.56 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
11 of 139
NV · 3.5
11 of 228

Josh is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Josh has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Josh has gone from the 11th to the 93rd percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
56.3%
49W–38L · 54.6% of games
3.5
64.7%
33W–18L · 55.8% of games
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history149 matches
L
Mitchell Pohlman / Michael Dali
2026-07-10 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Gianni Del Vecchio
−0.026below expectation — took 58% of games against 63% expected
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Michael Holcomb / Michael Ivy
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Stritt
−0.004about as expected — took 60% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Stritt
+0.043better than expected — took 63% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Wade Richardson / Colin Haas
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Stritt
−0.027below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Stritt
+0.040better than expected — took 63% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Brandon Trinh / Ryan Van
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Stritt
+0.015better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
JOHN MacDONALD / Pej Sabet
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Stritt
+0.005about as expected — took 57% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
N/A
2026-04-11 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.010better than expected — took 100% of games against 87% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Thomas Schinabeck
2026-04-11 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Gaetano Franceschi / Johnny Underwoodchamps
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · with Ken Kesick
−0.006about as expected — took 65% of games against 63% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-07 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Larry Gilmore / Adam Austin
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph D'Amato
+0.069better than expected — took 86% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.