← Search

Curtis Saludes

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
130 matches · 84W–46L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.44
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
79%
stay 3.5
21%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 95% stay · 5% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.37. Lower than today’s 3.44 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
36 of 139
NV · 3.5
45 of 228

Curtis is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Curtis has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Curtis has gone from the 59th to the 74th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
77.8%
21W–6L · 59.1% of games
3.5
67.6%
48W–23L · 55.8% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 64.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history130 matches
L
Blake Kelly / Mercedes Renteria IVchamps
2026-06-15 · #2 Doubles · with Samuel McIlvain
−0.006below expectation — took 32% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Justin Hseih / Ryan Van
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Schinabeck
−0.050below expectation — took 40% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Schinabeck
−0.011better than expected — took 100% of games against 87% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Josh Haldeman / Keith Stritt
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Silversmith
−0.040below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Christopher Silversmith / Carter Kesslerchamps
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · with Rod Faircloth
+0.014about as expected — took 42% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-08 · #2 Doubles · with Rod Faircloth
+0.063better than expected — took 71% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Christopher Silversmith / Carter Kesslerchamps
2026-04-07 · #1 Doubles · with Cj Park
+0.020about as expected — took 39% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Gary Miller / Adam Miller
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Austin
+0.001about as expected — took 57% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
James Hill / Russell Terao
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cj Park
+0.011about as expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blair McPhail
+0.029better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Robert E Kinsey / Sandy Mann
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gaetano Franceschi
+0.031better than expected — took 92% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
James Nassar
2025-12-13 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.004better than expected — took 72% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.