Search

Amy Badain

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
158 matches · 59W–99L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.94
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
77%
stay 3.0
23%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.87. Lower than today’s 2.94 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
59 of 134
NV · 3.0
74 of 166

Amy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amy has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

2.02.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Amy has gone from the 1st to the 50th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
50%
25W–25L · 47.2% of games
3.0
32%
31W–66L · 43.3% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history158 matches
L
Nicole Austin / Vanessa Landreman
2026-07-08 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Arcella
+0.048better than expected — took 52% of games against 33% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Kimberly Yang / Kellye Ray
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
+0.008about as expected — took 43% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Charlotte Durisseau / Maureen Kelly
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Wills
+0.020better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Julie Brown / Michelle Mortensen
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Addy Iveth Zilberman
+0.004about as expected — took 48% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Kelly Twells / Sandra Shearer
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniella Toms
0.008about as expected — took 44% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Amber Pasco / Dylan Underwood
2026-04-14 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shaza Nayef
+0.012better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Courtney Beine / Jena Domingue
2026-03-31 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Aldulaimi
0.025below expectation — took 40% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Rebecca Dunne / Kara Gaston
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shaza Nayef
+0.040better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Juli Kochanski / Jocelyn Goldman
2026-03-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
0.046below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Stacy Burr / Maria Dellett
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Aldulaimi
+0.006about as expected — took 55% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Tonia Fike / Vivian McCarthy
2026-02-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
+0.048better than expected — took 75% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Hannah Tang / Ara Lee Stimson
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Wills
+0.057better than expected — took 71% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.