← Search

Jocelyn Goldman

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
298 matches · 156W–142L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jocelyn Goldman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history298 matches
W
2026-06-06 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Luanne Balelo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-16 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Behnen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-15 · DTC #3 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Loretta Moses
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz MacDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-28 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Gamberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-21 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valerie Valow-Orris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-14 · SPANISH OAKS · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valerie Valow-Orris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-07 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Wendy Cashin / Jaqueline Schultz
2026-03-28 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Morley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-27 · DTC #3 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Adrienne Berman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
62.2%
107W–65L · 56.5% of games
3.5
31.9%
30W–64L · 42.8% of games
6.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 67.7% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 57.8% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
129 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
63 matches
#4 Doubles
21%
62 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
12 matches
#3 Female Doubles
4%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal