Search

Dianne Austin

North Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
87 matches · 38W–49L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.93
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
80%
stay 3.0
20%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 95% stay · 5% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.87. Lower than today’s 2.93 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
NV · 3.0
77 of 166

Dianne is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dianne has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Dianne has gone from the 5th to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
2.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 65.9% of games
3.0
36.4%
24W–42L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history87 matches
L
Tamaris Cotta / Jocelyn Hermanchamps
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Ann Shah
+0.004about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Rachel Glaze / Anna Clarkchamps
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Brinlee
0.007about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · with Michelle Brinlee
+0.017about as expected — took 41% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Jennifer Lake / Nadine Kluger
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Brinlee
0.011about as expected — took 67% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Elizabeth Eshragh / Stacy Burr
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Brinlee
0.001about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Shiniqual Washington / Ada Vera
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Venetia Espinueva
0.003about as expected — took 38% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Venetia Espinueva
+0.024better than expected — took 60% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Chelsie Hawkinson / Kelly Perkins
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maryna Post
+0.004about as expected — took 55% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Robi Hinton / Erika Cravens
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Venetia Espinueva
+0.021about as expected — took 38% of games against 34% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Carolina Nigro / Elizabeth Pierce
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Venetia Espinueva
+0.002about as expected — took 55% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Wendy Cashin / Yesenia Arias
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Venetia Espinueva
0.064below expectation — took 14% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Michelle Simister / Arika Carrier
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jihee Anh
0.026below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.