← Search

Kristy Andrade

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
243 matches · 122W–121L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.90
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
89%
stay 3.0
11%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.84. Lower than today’s 2.90 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
75 of 134
NV · 3.0
94 of 166

Kristy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kristy has been a steady 3.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Kristy has gone from the 66th to the 56th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
65.3%
49W–26L · 56.2% of games
3.5
34.4%
33W–63L · 44.7% of games
6.0
69.2%
27W–12L · 55.8% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 40.7% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history243 matches
W
Kimberly Lippisch / Margaret Hicks
2026-07-13 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Inman
+0.013better than expected — took 58% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Patricia Braganza / Marcela Urcia
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Helen McDaniel
+0.007about as expected — took 48% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Consuelo Kinahan
+0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Consuelo Kinahan
+0.045better than expected — took 63% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Arika Carrier / Leslie Brodiechamps
2026-04-08 · #1 Doubles · with Julie Brown
+0.002below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Loretta Moses
−0.039below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Knotts
+0.023better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Loretta Moses
−0.007better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Geraldine Wright / Elizabeth Eshragh
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Brown
−0.013about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Angela Zobrist / Julie Christensen
2026-02-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vikki Doak
+0.011about as expected — took 56% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Joan Chevalier / Marla Weitzman
2026-01-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vikki Doak
+0.006about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Lindsey Jacobs / Sandra Walford
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Clark
−0.042below expectation — took 62% of games against 73% expected
6-2, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.