Search

Sheila Stetts

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
307 matches · 100W–207L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
17 of 22
NV · 3.0
126 of 166

Sheila is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sheila has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Sheila has gone from the 61st to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
24.8%
33W–100L · 42.1% of games
6.0
56.2%
36W–28L · 53.7% of games
7.0
27.7%
28W–73L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history307 matches
L
Sheri Cherubino / Juli Kochanski
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peggy Latour
0.029below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Davis
0.007about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Xin Wei / Maureen Kelly
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cherry Marshall
+0.050better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Melissa Ruediger / Charlotte Durisseau
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cherry Marshall
0.072below expectation — took 0% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Blanca Avila / Tracey Gray
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cherry Marshall
+0.030better than expected — took 41% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cherry Marshall
+0.039better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Deborah O'Connor / Margaret Hicks
2026-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cherry Marshall
+0.034better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-01-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cherry Marshall
+0.018better than expected — took 60% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cherry Marshall
+0.013better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Margaret Albert / Margaret Hicks
2026-01-16 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cherry Marshall
0.014below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Monica Taylor / Ali Wolak
2025-12-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Graham
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-0
L
Judith Kraus / Donna Staack
2025-12-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cherry Marshall
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.