Search

Donna Staack

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
71 matches · 22W–49L · seasons 20192025
Where Donna sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Donna is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Donna has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Donna has gone from the 20th to the 20th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
29.3%
17W–41L · 43.9% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 45.1% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 53% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history71 matches
L
2025-12-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janis Elliott
0.019below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-12-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judith Kraus
+0.024better than expected — took 86% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Karen Duddlesten / Barbara Stewart
2025-11-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janis Elliott
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-0
L
Kelly Schwalbe / Deborah O'Connor
2025-11-07 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline Magno
0.011below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Michel
0.016below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2023-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rika Cook
0.046below expectation — took 33% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Su Jin Lee / Jenny Baxter
2023-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jerri Blutman
+0.016better than expected — took 56% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
Christina St. John / Katya Ross
2023-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Castillo
+0.036better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-04-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Cook
+0.039better than expected — took 62% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-12-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rika Cook
0.008about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2022-11-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Childs
0.022below expectation — took 59% of games against 65% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2022-11-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rika Cook
+0.037better than expected — took 92% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.