Search

Cheryl Landholm

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
117 matches · 41W–76L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.62
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
6%
down to 2.5
94%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
129 of 134
NV · 3.0
161 of 166

Cheryl is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cheryl has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Cheryl has gone from the 75th to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
40.5%
17W–25L · 44.6% of games
6.0
32.1%
9W–19L · 45.6% of games
7.0
31.9%
15W–32L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history117 matches
L
Melanie Schmacker / Megan Bender
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tori Rosenthal
0.033below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Braganza
0.025below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-01-09 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Trish Bradley-Garvin
0.070below expectation — took 33% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-11-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelly Figueredo
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-3
L
Kelly Schwalbe / Suelue Anderson
2025-10-31 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tori Rosenthal
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-2
W
Mary Michel / Donna Staack
2025-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tori Rosenthal
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-4
W
Kellie Woods / Maureen Kelly
2025-10-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Trish Bradley-Garvin
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Joan Chevalier / Kelly Schwalbe
2025-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelly Figueredo
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Geraldine Wright
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
4-1
L
Melissa Ruediger / Megan Bender
2025-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Braganza
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Braganza
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-2
L
Suelue Anderson / Mieko Kitamura
2025-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Braganza
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
1-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.