Search

Shelly Figueredo

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
111 matches · 33W–78L · seasons 20202026
Where Shelly sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Shelly is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shelly has been a steady 3.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

2.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Shelly has gone from the 17th to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
30.8%
24W–54L · 44.3% of games
6.0
25%
8W–24L · 40.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history111 matches
W
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Trish Bradley-Garvin
+0.045better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-11-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Landholm
0.032below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Joan Chevalier / Kelly Schwalbe
2025-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Landholm
0.037below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Richardson
0.039below expectation — took 28% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2025-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Crosby
0.035below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Yong Mi DeMilliano / Nancy Ozun
2025-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Trish Bradley-Garvin
0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lily Ward
0.005below expectation — took 32% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Heather DeMasi / Carissa Wolff
2025-01-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Richardson
0.006about as expected — took 45% of games against 48% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-12-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Braganza
0.022below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-12-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Templeton
+0.085better than expected — took 80% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-12-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Arline Marquez
+0.022about as expected — took 33% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-11-22 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Templeton
0.009about as expected — took 62% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.