← Search

Mary Martinat

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
109 matches · 24W–85L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.71
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
120 of 134
NV · 3.0
150 of 166

Mary is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mary has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.03.520202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Mary has gone from the 8th to the 36th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
6.9%
4W–54L · 29.5% of games
6.0
42.5%
17W–23L · 46.3% of games
7.0
0%
0W–6L · 20.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history109 matches
L
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra Johnson
−0.045below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
ANN MARIE WEAVER / Gina Rivera
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Casovan
+0.010about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Patricia Booth / Mary Michel
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carla Kuhl
+0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Karen Miller / Valeria Perdomo
2026-04-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Kuhl
+0.031about as expected — took 20% of games against 19% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carla Kuhl
+0.025better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Graham
−0.004below expectation — took 8% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Johnson
−0.034below expectation — took 14% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Sally Morley / Judith Kraus
2026-02-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carla Kuhl
−0.009below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carla Kuhl
−0.026about as expected — took 71% of games against 73% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Casovan
+0.001below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-12-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Casovan
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-1
L
Christine LaBarre / Kimberly Simons
2025-12-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Graham
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.