Teams

SPANISH TRAIL #1

2026 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 7.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-06-04vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Schwartz / Debra Horns vs Joan Perricone / Terri Keener6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Casovan / Victoria Khelifi vs Miriam Pasimio / Sally Zimmerman1-6, 2-6
2026-05-28vs DRAGONRIDGE CC #2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Debra Horns vs Anne Gumm / Sheri Cherubino1-6, 1-6
2026-05-21vs SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Debra Horns vs Karen Miller / Arlene Babbitt2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Petersen / Marisa Ptak vs Margaret Pettigrew / Nilda Chang3-6, 4-6
2026-05-14vs SIENA SUMMERLINWon 20
W#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Debra Horns vs Cynthia Whyte / Joan Stertzer7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVictoria Khelifi / Jane Casovan vs Helen McDaniel / Alisia Pulella6-1, 7-6
2026-05-07vs DTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Debra Horns vs Suni Chabrow / Kelly McPherson7-5, 6-2
2026-04-30vs O'CALLAGHAN PARKLost 02
L#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Debra Horns vs Kami Bowler / Gina Case3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesVictoria Khelifi / Peggy Latour vs Michelle Alber / Kayleen Krahenbuhl3-6, 3-6
2026-04-23vs SUN CITY ANTHEM #1Split 11
W#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Debra Horns vs Clairen Peeters / Deborah Rogers6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesVictoria Khelifi / Debra Johnson vs Pam Barrie / Stacie Corelle2-6, 1-6
2026-04-16vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Debra Horns vs Joan Perricone / Jennifer Petrie0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Petersen / Marie Ramsey vs Jane Doe / Mary Stengel2-6, 5-7
2026-04-09vs DRAGONRIDGE CC #2Split 11
L#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Pamela Rusk vs Anne Gumm / Sheri Cherubino2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarie Ramsey / Karen Petersen vs Marchelle Locke / Gina Rivera5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-02vs SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Petersen / Debra Horns vs Carrie Whipple / Diane Paull3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Debra Horns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Pamela Rusk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Victoria Khelifi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Marie Ramsey
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Cheryl Schwartz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Marisa Ptak
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.72
Carla Kuhl
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Karolyn Willoughby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Peggy Latour
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.61
Deborah Graham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Debra Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.57
Jane Casovan
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.44
Mary Martinat
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Karen Petersen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Ramsey + Marisa Ptak431259% games+2.4% vs expected
Jane Casovan + Marisa Ptak21043% games+0.6% vs expected
Debra Horns + Pamela Rusk132646% games−1.3% vs expected
Deborah Graham + Carla Kuhl193544% games−2.4% vs expected
Pamela Rusk + Carla Kuhl2346% games−2.9% vs expected
Pamela Rusk + Victoria Khelifi7851% games−3.5% vs expected
Peggy Latour + Karolyn Willoughby222950% games−3.5% vs expected
Deborah Graham + Mary Martinat2837% games−5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debra Horns
40W–72L career · 10 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Pamela Rusk
77W–134L career · 8 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Victoria Khelifi
58W–109L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Marie Ramsey
87W–120L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Cheryl Schwartz
36W–96L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Marisa Ptak
86W–92L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Carla Kuhl
71W–204L career · 9 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Karolyn Willoughby
25W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Peggy Latour
71W–119L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Deborah Graham
56W–153L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.61
3
Debra Johnson
2W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Jane Casovan
124W–184L career · 7 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Mary Martinat
24W–85L career · 4 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
Karen Petersen
52W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.