← Search

Valeria Perdomo

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
297 matches · 196W–101L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.27
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
72 of 139
NV · 3.5
115 of 228

Valeria is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Valeria has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Valeria has gone from the 82nd to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
62.3%
134W–81L · 54.2% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 45.6% of games
7.0
77%
57W–17L · 59.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history297 matches
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Karen Miller
+0.018better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Miller
−0.022about as expected — took 62% of games against 67% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Miller
−0.007better than expected — took 100% of games against 86% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Marchelle Locke / Gina Rivera
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Miller
−0.021below expectation — took 59% of games against 65% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly McPherson
+0.048better than expected — took 71% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Paull
+0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Sandy Biedryck / Tammie Quinlan
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ara Lee Stimson
−0.049below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Paull
+0.013better than expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Paull
−0.008better than expected — took 100% of games against 86% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Paull
−0.017about as expected — took 62% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
Mary Stengel / Kathy Ford
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Paull
+0.011better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Elisabeth Skinner / Maggie Skinner
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Paull
−0.022below expectation — took 60% of games against 66% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.