Search

Krista Kabacy

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
94 matches · 67W–27L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.40
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
89%
stay 3.5
11%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.34. Lower than today’s 3.40 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
11 of 73
NV · 3.5
57 of 228

Krista is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Krista has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Krista has gone from the 79th to the 91st percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
71.7%
38W–15L · 57.7% of games
7.0
75%
27W–9L · 59.9% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history94 matches
W
Amy Waters / Betty Hale
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Luann Holmes
0.000about as expected — took 65% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Anne Kellogg / Karrie Bennallack
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Luann Holmes
0.005about as expected — took 63% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luann Holmes
0.005about as expected — took 63% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Luann Holmes
0.012about as expected — took 47% of games against 52% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luann Holmes
+0.005about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Lisa Cook / Kelly Kedge
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joni Kerby
0.053below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Amy Waters / Sabine Curtis
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Luann Holmes
0.017below expectation — took 45% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Valeria Perdomo / Diane Paull
2026-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Baldwin
0.013below expectation — took 53% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Monica Baldwin / Patricia Delgado
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joni Kerby
+0.029better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Baldwin
0.020below expectation — took 54% of games against 62% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Judith MacKenzie / Stephanie Tegano
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joni Kerby
0.007about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Skye Alleman / Krislyn Millar
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Baldwin
+0.013better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.