← Search

Janelle Wells

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 86W–46L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Janelle Wells to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-05-15 · DTC #2 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine LaBarre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-09 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-01 · DTC #2 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine LaBarre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-24 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Randell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-21 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Randell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-14 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine LaBarre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · with Christine LaBarre championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-06 · #3 Doubles · with Christine LaBarre championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-31 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Randell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-27 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine LaBarre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-24 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz MacDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-07 · DTC #4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Mortensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
64.8%
35W–19L · 55.3% of games
3.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 45.1% of games
6.0
82.4%
28W–6L · 64.9% of games
7.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
10 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams