Search

Janelle Wells

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
132 matches · 86W–46L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.04
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
29%
stay 3.0
71%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 73% stay · 27% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.95. Lower than today’s 3.04 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
37 of 134
NV · 3.0
48 of 166

Janelle is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Janelle has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Janelle has gone from the 35th to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
64.8%
35W–19L · 55.3% of games
3.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 45.1% of games
6.0
82.4%
28W–6L · 64.9% of games
7.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine LaBarre
0.064below expectation — took 25% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Blanca Avila / Mary Michel
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Olson
+0.053better than expected — took 63% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Carrie Maddux / Therese Laudenslager
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine LaBarre
0.003about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Randell
+0.022better than expected — took 55% of games against 43% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Juli Kochanski / Karen Veazey
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Randell
0.007about as expected — took 58% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine LaBarre
0.022below expectation — took 46% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
Casey Primmer / ANN MARIE WEAVERchamps
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · with Christine LaBarre
0.014below expectation — took 46% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · #3 Doubles · with Christine LaBarre
+0.017better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Christina Smith / Jeralyn Marchesi
2026-03-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Randell
+0.040better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine LaBarre
0.009better than expected — took 100% of games against 87% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Yesenia Arias / Jihee Anh
2026-03-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz MacDonald
0.031below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Aida Shirley / Elizabeth Templeton
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Mortensen
+0.006better than expected — took 68% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.