← Search

Melanie Schmacker

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
114 matches · 63W–51L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.92
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
84%
stay 3.0
16%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.86. Lower than today’s 2.92 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
65 of 134
NV · 3.0
82 of 166

Melanie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Melanie has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.0202020212022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Melanie has gone from the 2nd to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
75.9%
22W–7L · 61.7% of games
3.0
46.9%
38W–43L · 46.9% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history114 matches
L
ANN MARIE WEAVER / CHRISTINE McNair
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Blais
−0.005below expectation — took 35% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Joan Chevalier / Kelly Schwalbe
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Blais
+0.019better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Abigail Cox / Laura Rawlins
2026-05-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vrushali Daulat
−0.013below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Janis Elliott / Sharon Pleines
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Brown
−0.010about as expected — took 56% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Danielle Caswell / Seina Gebben
2026-04-14 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vrushali Daulat
−0.028below expectation — took 52% of games against 63% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Megan Bender
+0.033better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vrushali Daulat
+0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Susannah Wilson / Pamela Taylor
2026-03-24 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vrushali Daulat
+0.055better than expected — took 100% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Elizabeth Pierce / Julie Hughes
2026-03-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vrushali Daulat
+0.020better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Ani Zargaryan / Tayoni Coleman
2026-02-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Yamane
−0.022below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irene Frazier
+0.025better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Shea Villamor / Sarah Jane Howell
2026-01-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Yamane
−0.030below expectation — took 53% of games against 62% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.