← Search

Nedra Paschal

Henderson, NV
0.0 year-end
108 matches · 62W–46L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Nedra sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Nedra is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nedra has been 3.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.5201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Nedra has gone from the 71st to the 25th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
57.1%
32W–24L · 52.6% of games
7.0
59.1%
26W–18L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history108 matches
L
2022-12-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Schopp
+0.026better than expected — took 37% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-11-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Schopp
−0.037below expectation — took 8% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2022-10-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly McPherson
−0.037below expectation — took 8% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Doreen Lono / Patricia Hawkins
2022-03-31 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Schopp
+0.012better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Deborah Davis / Terri Green
2022-03-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wacharee Rosenberg
−0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2022-02-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with June Sartini
+0.019about as expected — took 29% of games against 29% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Carol McDermott / Susan Sadler
2022-02-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with June Sartini
+0.051better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Judith Kraus / Kay Higer
2022-02-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ursula Kirschner
−0.012below expectation — took 41% of games against 47% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Eva Dahl / Kathleen Tannerchamps
2022-01-29 · #2 Doubles · with Wacharee Rosenberg
+0.010about as expected — took 57% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Sandra Allie / Mary Chodroffchamps
2022-01-29 · #2 Doubles · with Wacharee Rosenberg
−0.049below expectation — took 25% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Mary Jo Cecil / Ginny McGowanchamps
2022-01-28 · #2 Doubles · with Wacharee Rosenberg
+0.017better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Marsha Fosburgh / Cindy Harriagechamps
2022-01-28 · #2 Doubles · with Wacharee Rosenberg
+0.058better than expected — took 75% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.