Search

Ursula Kirschner

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
83 matches · 41W–42L · seasons 20192023
Where Ursula sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Ursula is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ursula has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Ursula has gone from the 79th to the 37th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
51.7%
15W–14L · 52.4% of games
7.0
49%
24W–25L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history83 matches
L
Jackie Seavey / Judith Kraus
2023-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rae Ann Yost
0.024below expectation — took 39% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2023-02-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Schopp
0.001below expectation — took 8% of games against 23% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2023-01-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rae Ann Yost
0.037below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Cynthia Lau / Julie Neibaur
2022-11-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Rapp
0.036below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2022-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rosemary Erlanger
0.025below expectation — took 38% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-10-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Schopp
+0.019about as expected — took 20% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Stefani Warren / Kelly Griffin
2022-10-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rosemary Erlanger
+0.053better than expected — took 63% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
N/A
2022-10-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ingrid Fitzgerald
0.035about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Sally Bigler / Diane Sorrentino
2022-05-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ingrid Fitzgerald
0.036below expectation — took 65% of games against 73% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Helen Johnson / Linda Fayne
2022-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ingrid Fitzgerald
0.005about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Christi Lin / Nick Snowmixed
2022-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Gutierrez
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Rose Peters / Susan Grady
2022-05-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rae Ann Yost
+0.050better than expected — took 68% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.