Teams

SPANISH TRAIL

2021 NTA ADULT 65 & OVER LEAGUE · 7.0 WOMEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-04vs WHITNEY MESA PARK #1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Christensen / Angela Zobrist vs Clairen Peeters / Wacharee Rosenberg2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCappi Bates / Ursula Kirschner vs Tina Felps / Lana Penrose1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJane Casovan / Deborah Graham vs Ruby Leong / Shirley Wu1-6, 4-6
2021-02-25vs DTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesUrsula Kirschner / Sheila Stetts vs Jill Paige / Patricia Freeman2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCherry Marshall / Minette Curnutt vs Marcela Urcia / Kay Higer4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJane Casovan / Deborah Graham vs Bonnie Longenecker / Joan Conner6-1, 6-3
2021-02-18vs SPANISH OAKSWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeborah Davis / Angela Zobrist vs Shay Momiroff / Annabel Elliott6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMinette Curnutt / Cherry Marshall vs June Sartini / Brenda Talley6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPeggy Latour / Karolyn Willoughby vs Carla Kuhl / Vicki Schwartz6-1, 6-1
2021-02-11vs WHITNEY MESA PARK #2Won 21
W#1 DoublesDeborah Davis / Minette Curnutt vs Linda Brinker / Joan Chevalier7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJane Casovan / Deborah Graham vs Denise Boone / Ginger Nakamura6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPeggy Latour / Karolyn Willoughby vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-02-04vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Zobrist / Julie Christensen vs Sally Zimmerman / Helen Johnson7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCherry Marshall / Cappi Bates vs Pat Schuldt / Karen Regin6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSheila Stetts / Ursula Kirschner vs Jo Szeto / Susan Olson3-6, 3-6
2021-01-28vs WHITNEY MESA PARK #1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesUrsula Kirschner / Peggy Latour vs Wacharee Rosenberg / Clairen Peeters2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Christensen / Angela Zobrist vs Rae Ann Yost / Shirley Wu6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCappi Bates / Cherry Marshall vs Tina Felps / Lana Penrose4-6, 4-6
2021-01-21vs DTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Christensen / Angela Zobrist vs Jill Paige / Marcela Urcia7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDeborah Davis / Ursula Kirschner vs Cheryl Weiss / Bonnie Longenecker6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJane Casovan / Deborah Graham vs Tikva Butler / Joan Conner6-4, 6-1
2021-01-14vs SPANISH OAKSWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Christensen / Angela Zobrist vs Ellen Arcella / Annabel Elliott6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeborah Davis / Cherry Marshall vs Carla Kuhl / Doris Gagne6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSheila Stetts / Jane Casovan vs Aldema Ridge / Vicki Schwartz6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Cappi Bates
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Minette Curnutt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Cherry Marshall
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.85
Angela Zobrist
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Deborah Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Julie Christensen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.71
Sheila Stetts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Karolyn Willoughby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Peggy Latour
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Deborah Graham
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
Jane Casovan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Ursula Kirschner
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Latour + Deborah Davis4443% games+5.2% vs expected
Sheila Stetts + Deborah Davis1742% games−0.2% vs expected
Angela Zobrist + Julie Christensen362354% games−0.6% vs expected
Cherry Marshall + Cappi Bates224546% games−2.0% vs expected
Peggy Latour + Karolyn Willoughby222950% games−3.5% vs expected
Cherry Marshall + Sheila Stetts153145% games−5.1% vs expected
Cherry Marshall + Minette Curnutt244644% games−7.1% vs expected
Jane Casovan + Sheila Stetts81840% games−8.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cappi Bates
66W–85L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Minette Curnutt
74W–107L career · 3 lines in 2021
23%76%<1%
3.09
3
Cherry Marshall
101W–196L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Angela Zobrist
163W–105L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Deborah Davis
51W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Christensen
92W–67L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Sheila Stetts
100W–207L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Karolyn Willoughby
25W–43L career · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Peggy Latour
71W–119L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Deborah Graham
56W–153L career · 4 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
2.61
3
Jane Casovan
124W–184L career · 5 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
2.57
0
Ursula Kirschner
41W–42L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.