← Search

Rosemary Erlanger

Boulder City, NV
0.0 year-end
105 matches · 50W–55L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Rosemary sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Rosemary is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rosemary has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Rosemary has gone from the 25th to the 62nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
46%
46W–54L · 49.1% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history105 matches
W
N/A
2023-11-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rika Cook
+0.003better than expected — took 100% of games against 82% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Heather Childs / Amy Kirk
2023-11-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Guarino
+0.013better than expected — took 61% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Hilary Vincent-Philpot / Carolyn Wood
2023-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Val Froman
+0.010better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2023-10-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Guarino
−0.011below expectation — took 35% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Judith Kraus / Sandy Biedryck
2023-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jerri Blutman
+0.022better than expected — took 62% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Vikki Doak / Holly Crosby
2023-09-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Thornton
+0.041better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Tracy Jones / Patricia Delgado
2023-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Guarino
−0.016below expectation — took 43% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Karlene Johnston / Sarah Kingsley
2023-05-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Christensen
+0.010better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Guarino
+0.001about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Natasha Spinella / Liliya Pummill
2023-04-26 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Fuller
−0.012below expectation — took 45% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2023-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Zobrist
+0.040better than expected — took 100% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2023-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Guarino
+0.008about as expected — took 53% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.