Search

Natasha Spinella

North Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2024
66 matches · 41W–25L · seasons 20192024
Where Natasha sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Natasha is one of 1627 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 67% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Natasha has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Natasha has gone from the 23rd to the 33rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
92.6%
25W–2L · 67.2% of games
3.5
41%
16W–23L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history66 matches
W
Karen Regin / Adriana Bhole
2024-11-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Warrington
+0.019better than expected — took 54% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-10-30 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liliya Pummill
0.009about as expected — took 54% of games against 58% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-10-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Lefebvre
0.058below expectation — took 20% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Kelley Oakley / Liz MacDonald
2024-09-25 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liliya Pummill
0.014below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-01-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andi Berger
0.016below expectation — took 47% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Liz MacDonald / Jeralyn Marchesi
2023-12-06 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Travis Azous
0.021about as expected — took 67% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Lorry Mazzara / Debbie Hicks
2023-11-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Lefebvre
0.002about as expected — took 44% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Kathie Dye / Valerie Fuller
2023-11-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Lefebvre
+0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-11-01 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Lefebvre
+0.017better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Valerie Fuller / Rosemary Erlanger
2023-04-26 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liliya Pummill
+0.014better than expected — took 55% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liliya Pummill
0.010about as expected — took 46% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Nancy Holland / Amy Levasseur
2023-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Lefebvre
0.014below expectation — took 37% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.