Search

Peggy Guarino

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
38 matches · 21W–17L · seasons 20192023
Where Peggy sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Peggy is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Peggy has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Peggy has gone from the 79th to the 47th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.5
56.8%
21W–16L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history38 matches
W
Heather Childs / Amy Kirk
2023-11-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Erlanger
+0.011better than expected — took 61% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2023-10-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Erlanger
0.012below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Tracy Jones / Patricia Delgado
2023-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Erlanger
0.018below expectation — took 43% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2023-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jerri Blutman
0.048below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2023-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Erlanger
0.002about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Erlanger
+0.006about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-03-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rika Cook
+0.018better than expected — took 65% of games against 55% expected
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2023-02-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Erlanger
0.012below expectation — took 44% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
Sheri Harper / Julie Sanford-Wible
2023-01-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Erlanger
+0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-01-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Erlanger
+0.040better than expected — took 45% of games against 34% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2023-01-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Erlanger
0.002better than expected — took 71% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2022-03-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hilary Vincent-Philpot
0.007below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.