← Search

Mandy Willis

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
209 matches · 117W–92L · seasons 2019–2025
Where Mandy sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Mandy is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mandy has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Mandy has gone from the 67th to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
70.5%
43W–18L · 59.2% of games
3.5
48.2%
40W–43L · 49.4% of games
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 32% of games
5.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
76.5%
13W–4L · 59.2% of games
6.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history209 matches
L
Anne Gumm / Christina Rich
2025-12-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Lefever
−0.029below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Val Froman / Monica Johnson
2025-11-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Schnitz
+0.022about as expected — took 33% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-10-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Wooldridge
−0.008below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mari Valvo
−0.026below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
N/A
2025-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Wooldridge
+0.015better than expected — took 100% of games against 77% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Warrington
−0.028below expectation — took 38% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Hicks
+0.004about as expected — took 46% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Diane Welch / Amy Nhaisi
2025-08-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Bell
−0.026below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Melissa Arcella / Laurie Lenhart
2025-08-27 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Schnitz
−0.039below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-08-06 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Karina McAffee
+0.047better than expected — took 92% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Leslie Brodie / Mary Lind
2025-07-30 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Meert
−0.010about as expected — took 56% of games against 59% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shellene Goudge
+0.019better than expected — took 41% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.