← Search

Clairen Peeters

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
299 matches · 124W–175L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Clairen Peeters to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history299 matches
L
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacie Corelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Winreb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Anne van Liere
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mieko Kitamura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marla Weitzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-09 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Schopp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams79 teams · 2005–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
40.1%
71W–106L · 46.2% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.7% of games
7.0
45.7%
42W–50L · 48.8% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 47% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 46.9% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
111 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
81 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
16 matches
#3 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal