← Search

Amalia Dominguez

Las Vegas, NV
0.0 year-end
84 matches · 45W–39L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Amalia sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Amalia is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amalia has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Amalia has gone from the 70th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
53.8%
43W–37L · 51.9% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history84 matches
W
2023-02-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Hernandez
+0.010about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-02-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy McPartlin
−0.019below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2023-02-01 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Higgins
−0.074below expectation — took 20% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Karen Kiyono / Hannah Tang
2023-01-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Spelman
+0.055better than expected — took 71% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Tina Morgan / Judith Milligan
2023-01-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arlene Babbitt
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Anne Martz / Carolyn Wood
2022-12-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Spelman
−0.004below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2022-12-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karrie Bennallack
−0.026below expectation — took 63% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Alison Orci / Kristi Crawford
2022-11-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Spelman
+0.044better than expected — took 61% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2022-11-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelley Oakley
−0.031below expectation — took 58% of games against 67% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2022-11-16 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Protell
+0.017better than expected — took 100% of games against 76% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2022-11-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arlene Babbitt
+0.034better than expected — took 56% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Garlan
−0.025below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.