Search

Shawanna Johnson

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
471 matches · 167W–304L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 30 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
110 of 134
NV · 3.0
137 of 166

Shawanna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams99 teams · 2015–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shawanna has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Shawanna has gone from the 33rd to the 18th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
41.6%
117W–164L · 48.4% of games
3.5
19.6%
22W–90L · 34.9% of games
7.0mixed
39.4%
26W–40L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history471 matches
L
Kimberly Cooks
2026-07-27 · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
0.084below expectation — took 25% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Danielle Pokroy
2026-07-13 · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
0.093below expectation — took 20% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-07-07 · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
+0.085better than expected — took 100% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Maggie Pacholuk
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Asad Nawaz
+0.000better than expected — took 58% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Melissa Hicks
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.026better than expected — took 45% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-05-09 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.072better than expected — took 100% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven McCrary
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Kimberly Cooks
2026-04-25 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.017below expectation — took 54% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Marilyn Fenn / Dan Michalskimixed
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Asad Nawaz
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-21 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Row
+0.018better than expected — took 62% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Shani Ma / Walter Sonntagmixed
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erik Burn
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.