Search

Renee Blango-Michie

Henderson, NV
3.0S year-end 2024
53 matches · 14W–39L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.75
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
26 of 29
NV · 3.0
170 of 193

Renee is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Renee has been 3.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.5201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Renee has gone from the 19th to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2020.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
31.7%
13W–28L · 43.9% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
10%
1W–9L · 26.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history53 matches
L
Blanca Avila / Tracey Gray
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Anne van Liere
0.004below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Anne van Liere
0.045below expectation — took 0% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Patricia Delgado / Joan Chevalier
2026-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Schopp
0.035below expectation — took 14% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Tori Rosenthal / Patricia Hawkins
2026-03-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Schopp
0.002below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Deborah Davis / Merrilu Kutcher
2026-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Schopp
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Schopp
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Deborah Graham / Debra Johnson
2026-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Schopp
+0.051better than expected — took 71% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Joann Komanowski / Robyn Davies
2026-02-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Schopp
+0.003below expectation — took 14% of games against 26% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-01-29 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Schopp
+0.009below expectation — took 8% of games against 19% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Joyce Barr / Marcia Loss
2026-01-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Schopp
+0.023about as expected — took 35% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-01-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Geraldine Wright
0.011below expectation — took 14% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Minette Curnutt / Kelly McPherson
2026-01-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Geraldine Wright
+0.026about as expected — took 25% of games against 24% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.