Search

Lance Allgower

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
227 matches · 88W–139L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.08
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
16%
stay 3.0
84%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 61% stay · 39% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.98. Lower than today’s 3.08 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
31 of 134
NV · 3.0
40 of 166

Lance is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lance has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 2 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Lance has gone from the 84th to the 92nd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
3.0
79.4%
27W–7L · 64.4% of games
3.5
32.9%
25W–51L · 44.8% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 26.7% of games
5.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.7% of games
6.0mixed
44.1%
15W–19L · 49.5% of games
6.5mixed
17.6%
3W–14L · 38.6% of games
7.0mixed
28%
7W–18L · 37.6% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 36.7% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history227 matches
L
Brandon Myers / Rebecca Dunnemixed
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jocelyn Herman
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Maria de Lourdes Herrera / Travis Millsmixed
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Aleksandra Szklarewicz
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Judah Dorn / Jennifer Hemlychamps
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Kristin Stowe
0.006below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Mercedes Renteria IV / Shellene Goudgemixed
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Garlan
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 1-0
W
Victor Pluto / Talia Galvezmixed
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tina Nathalia
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Ramona Acosta / Jack Stevensmixed
2026-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Little
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Michelle Meert / Qing Guomixed
2026-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie MacDonald
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Alan Mcgrath / Heather Hartzellmixed
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristin Stowe
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristin Stowe
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Carlos Aguirre / Michelle Brinleemixed
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Garlan
+0.000better than expected — took 56% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Angel Hinojosa / Julie Smithmixed
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tina Nathalia
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Lisa Gaughan / John Gaughanmixed
2026-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristin Stowe
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.