← Search

Thalia Vidal Roper

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
267 matches · 195W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Thalia Vidal Roper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history267 matches
L
2026-07-25 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mae Loftus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-30 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tina Back
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-25 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tina Back
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-17 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tina Back
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-04-11 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-10 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Haines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-03-27 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with V Kate Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-13 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anne Martz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-27 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tina Back
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-02-20 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with V Kate Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
87.5%
35W–5L · 63.8% of games
4.0
82.7%
62W–13L · 63.6% of games
4.5
66.4%
77W–39L · 55.5% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 59.4% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 57% of games
8.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.9% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
80 matches
#1 Singles
24%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
34 matches
#2 Singles
6%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams