← Search

Rosa McGuire

Heber City, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 156W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rosa McGuire to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history199 matches
L
Kari Keogh / Maria Staszcuk
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Mandy Berg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Arashan Heikkila championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Britney Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Britney Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Lauren Hawley / Laura Savage
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Mariana Gaitan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Caldwell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
Brook Vietor / Heidi Gordon
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Lisa Caldwell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Deyce Peterson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Britney Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mandy Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 76.9% of games
3.5
81%
17W–4L · 61.9% of games
4.0
83%
83W–17L · 64% of games
4.5
70.4%
19W–8L · 58.9% of games
8.0
100%
4W–0L · 61% of games
8.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
44 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert