← Search

Brook Vietor

Park City, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
195 matches · 150W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brook Vietor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history195 matches
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Diana Granger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Arashan Heikkila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Diana Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracey Valentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Arashan Heikkila championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Kimberly Simpson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Rosa McGuire / Lisa Caldwell
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Heidi Gordon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heidi Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Deyce Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Arashan Heikkila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 58.8% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
81.7%
98W–22L · 62.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 63.3% of games
9.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 54.2% of games
9.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
42 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer