← Search

Cyndi Jones

Park City, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
278 matches · 154W–124L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cyndi Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history278 matches
W
2026-08-06 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mariana Gaitan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mariana Gaitan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 55% of games
4.5
59.9%
124W–83L · 54.1% of games
5.0
7.1%
1W–13L · 30% of games
8.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 48.4% of games
9.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 50.8% of games
9.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 55% of the time
#1 Singles
55%
152 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
33 matches
#2 Singles
9%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
21 matches
#1 Female Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova