Teams

Game On

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.5W AM

18 players · average NTRP 4.23 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-27vs SunPro-Allen/SeegmillerWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarianne Squires / Tricia Sederberg vs Jen Langston / Nancy Kirk0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela Bleak / Tricia Sederberg vs Britney Ewing / Rosa McGuire2-6, 1-6
2026-07-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Black / Tricia Sederberg vs Jennifer Hathaway / Linda Marz2-6, 2-6
2026-06-29vs SunPro-Allen/SeegmillerLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Black / Tricia Sederberg vs Christy Davidson / Nancy Kirk2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5W AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park-Vietor/Alder7124821240
2Liberty Park-Kemp/Wallace26122044320
3Game On17112147343

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Mariana Gaitan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.22
Amy Woolley
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Cyndi Jones
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.14
Dawn Volsch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.11
Tricia Sederberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
4.11
Jane McQuade
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Karina Herman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.03
Marianne Squires
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
4.00
Paige Miller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.97
Michelle Porter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.92
Marcela Pomadoro
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published 4
3.86
Cathy Davis
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.83
Kat Fuller
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Trisha Cutrer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.76
Angela Bleak
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.74
Kim Cronin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.65
Lee Chase
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.61
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kat Fuller + Trisha Cutrer362357% games+12.6% vs expected
Angela Bleak + Kat Fuller4552% games+11.4% vs expected
Jane McQuade + Paige Miller7160% games+7.5% vs expected
Mariana Gaitan + Cyndi Jones8259% games+7.2% vs expected
Angela Bleak + Trisha Cutrer7163% games+5.8% vs expected
Karina Herman + Amy Woolley321256% games+4.3% vs expected
Kim Cronin + Angela Bleak71147% games+2.3% vs expected
Amy Woolley + Cathy Davis11854% games−1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mariana Gaitan
14W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Amy Woolley
192W–98L career · 9 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Cyndi Jones
154W–124L career · 12 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Dawn Volsch
4W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
4.14
4
Tricia Sederberg
62W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
4.11
4.5
Jane McQuade
266W–179L career · 6 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
4.11
Karina Herman
63W–63L career · 8 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Marianne Squires
47W–49L career · 9 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
Paige Miller
80W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
Michelle Porter
28W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.97
4
Marcela Pomadoro
135W–82L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4.5
Cathy Davis
47W–78L career · 7 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.86
4
Kat Fuller
131W–95L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Trisha Cutrer
208W–112L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Angela Bleak
214W–163L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Kim Cronin
380W–237L career · 15 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Lee Chase
48W–33L career · 9 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury
77W–136L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.