← Search

Deyce Peterson

Heber City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
215 matches · 173W–42L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Deyce Peterson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history215 matches
W
2026-08-13 · #4 Doubles · with Heather Probst championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
Delaney Canning / Dana Rosellini
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Jessica Schulz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mandy Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rina Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-27 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Jennifer Johnson / Kelley Epstein
2026-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mandy Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Nancy Kirk / Kristi Dial
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Mariana Gaitan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Korb championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
87%
40W–6L · 66.5% of games
4.0
83.3%
95W–19L · 63.5% of games
4.5
75%
6W–2L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
63 matches
#1 Singles
26%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
14 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe